TheDose

Isoeugenol

Also known as Isoeugenol, 2-Methoxy-4-(1-propen-1-yl)phenol, 2-Methoxy-4-propenylphenol, 4-Hydroxy-3-methoxy-1-propenylbenzene, 4-Hydroxy-3-methoxy-beta-methylstyrene, 4-Propenylguaiacol, Phenol, 2-methoxy-4-(1-propenyl)-

SCCSEU CosIngPubMed

Safe with conditions

EU SCCS says: restricted.”

Isoeugenol (CAS 97-54-1; 2-methoxy-4-(prop-1-enyl)phenol; C10H12O2) is the propenyl-substituted methoxyphenol isomer of eugenol (eugenol is the allyl-substituted analogue). Trade material is predominantly the trans (E) isomer (CAS 5932-68-3; 82-88% per SCCS/1459/11 p. 200), with cis (Z) isomer (CAS 5912-86-7) as a minor constituent. Isoeugenol is a long-established fragrance allergen on the original 26-substance list regulated under EU Cosmetics Regulation 1223/2009 Annex III Reference 73, requiring label declaration above 0,001% in leave-on and 0,01% in rinse-off products AND carrying a hard maximum-use cap of 0,02% in non-oral products — a stricter restriction than most other Annex III fragrance allergens (which are labeling-only) reflecting isoeugenol's higher sensitisation potency. The SCCS opinion SCCS/1459/11 (2012) classifies Isoeugenol in Table 13-1 (p. 107) as an established contact allergen in humans with a +++ rating (101-1000 published positive patch test cases) and asterisks it as a 1999 SCCNFP-listed allergen; Table 13-5 (p. 114) places it among the 12 single-chemical established fragrance allergens of special concern. Critically, SCCS/1459/11 Section 13.3 / Table 13-6 (p. 118-119) classifies Isoeugenol as an established PROHAPTEN of clinical importance — bioactivated by skin enzymatic oxidation, with NO mark in the 'Activation by air oxidation' column. This distinguishes Isoeugenol mechanistically from prehapten allergens like Limonene and Linalool: Isoeugenol does NOT have a peroxide cap recommendation in SCCS/1459/11 (the 10 ppm peroxide guidance is for hydroperoxide-forming prehaptens). The mechanistic basis comes from Bertrand et al. 1997 (Chem Res Toxicol, PMID 9084914): Isoeugenol acts via direct enzymatic oxidation to a para-quinone methide WITHOUT the O-demethylation step that Eugenol's ortho-quinone pathway requires — a mechanistically distinct prohapten pathway. More recent work by Ahn, Avonto, Chittiboyina and colleagues (PMID 32119530 in 2020 and PMID 37042673 in 2023) has identified diastereomeric 7,4'-oxyneolignan dimers as additional thiol-reactive isoeugenol oxidation products and proposed a hydroxy quinone methide as the actual reactive intermediate, suggesting isoeugenol may also possess prehapten character via autoxidation/degradation — but the binding SCCS regulatory classification remains prohapten-only. Per-ingredient patch test data (SCCS/1459/11 p. 200) show 1.3-5.4% positive reactions across multiple consecutive-tested European dermatology populations: IVDK 2007 1.3% (n=2063); Groningen 2009 1.3% at 2% pet.; Wöhrl 2001 5.4% (n=747); St Johns 2001-2005 with incremental year-on-year incidence reaching 2.67%; IVDK 2010 1.62% (n=1214) consecutively / 3.41% (n=5747) aimed-tested; Alicante extended fragrance series 11/86 (12.8%). Isoeugenol is one of only four substances (with HICC, cinnamal, and hydroxycitronellal) for which the SCCS judged dose-response data exist (p. 115) — although insufficient to derive an individual safe threshold. Cross-reactivity with isoeugenyl acetate is documented: White et al. 1999 (PMID 10554062) demonstrated that the majority of isoeugenol-allergic patients were also intolerant of isoeugenyl acetate, ruling it out as a safer replacement; a similar relationship is encoded in SCCS/1459/11 Section 13.4 conclusions which list isoeugenyl acetate as needing equivalent regulatory treatment to isoeugenol. The RIFM Expert Panel safety assessment (Api et al. 2016, PMID 26723296, FCT 97(S1):S49-S56) integrates these data into a comprehensive industry safety profile: repeated-dose NOAEL 37.5 mg/kg/day with MOE 5,769 (assuming 38.4% dermal absorption and 100% inhalation absorption), supporting continued use within QRA-derived limits and IFRA Standards. CIR has NOT published a standalone Isoeugenol assessment — verified absent by alphabetical traversal of the September 2022 CIR Quick Reference Table (alphabetically: Isodecyl Stearate → Isododecane → Isoeicosane → Isohexadecane, with no Isoeugenol row in between), consistent with CIR's deferral of pure fragrance ingredients to RIFM/IFRA/SCCS.


Found in nutmeg oil, clove leaf/stem oil, and ylang-ylang oil — provides characteristic warm, spicy-floral, carnation-like fragrance note distinct from eugenol's clove note (the propenyl positional isomerism shifts the olfactory profile).

RIFM Expert Panel safety assessment (Api et al. 2016, FCT 97(Suppl 1):S49-S56, PMID 26723296) integrates skin sensitisation, genotoxicity, repeated-dose, developmental, reproductive, respiratory, and phototoxicity data — supports continued use at IFRA/QRA-derived fragrance-typical concentrations within the EU 0,02% cap.

2016 RIFM evaluation identified repeated-dose NOAEL of 37.5 mg/kg/day with MOE of 5,769 (assuming 38.4% dermal absorption and 100% inhalation absorption) — large safety margin for systemic endpoints at typical cosmetic exposure (well above the MOE >100 acceptability threshold).

Dose-response data exist (one of only 4 fragrance allergens with such data per SCCS/1459/11 p. 115) — provides scientific basis for the Annex III 0,02% maximum-use cap and individual safe-use threshold derivation efforts.


Concerns
  • · Trans-isomer (CAS 5932-68-3) dominates trade material at 82-88%; cis-isomer (CAS 5912-86-7) is the minor constituent. Annex III Reference 73 covers both isomers under the same restriction.

Established contact allergen in humans per SCCS/1459/11 Table 13-1 (p. 107): +++ rating (101-1000 published positive patch test cases); asterisked as identified in the 1999 SCCNFP fragrance allergens opinion. Listed in Table 13-5 (p. 114) among 12 single-chemical established fragrance allergens of SPECIAL CONCERN.

Established PROHAPTEN per SCCS/1459/11 Section 13.3 / Table 13-6 (p. 118-119): bioactivated by skin enzymatic oxidation directly to an electrophilic para-quinone methide WITHOUT the O-demethylation step that Eugenol requires (Bertrand 1997, PMID 9084914). Mechanistically distinct from prehaptens — no peroxide cap recommendation in SCCS/1459/11 because hydroperoxide formation is not the principal sensitisation route.

EU Annex III Reference 73 imposes a hard maximum-use cap of 0,02% in non-oral cosmetic products — STRICTER than most other Annex III fragrance allergens (which carry labeling-only restrictions) reflecting isoeugenol's higher sensitisation potency among the original 26 allergens.

Mandatory EU label disclosure (Annex III Reference 73) when concentration exceeds 0,001% leave-on or 0,01% rinse-off; ingredient cannot be hidden under generic 'Parfum/Fragrance' declaration above these thresholds.

Patch test prevalence: 1.3-5.4% positive reactions in baseline dermatology series across multiple European studies (IVDK 2007 n=2063, Groningen 2009, Wöhrl 2001 n=747, IVDK 2010 n=1214); 11/86 (12.8%) on Alicante extended fragrance series; St Johns Institute 2001-2005 saw year-on-year increasing incidence reaching 2.67% (SCCS/1459/11 p. 200). Among the higher-prevalence fragrance contact allergens.

Cross-reactivity with isoeugenyl acetate: the majority of isoeugenol-allergic patients also react to the acetate (White et al. 1999, PMID 10554062), ruling it out as a safer substitute. Isoeugenol esters (acetate, benzoate, phenylacetate, methyl ether) carry equivalent regulatory treatment per SCCS/1459/11 Section 13.4 conclusion.

Cross-reactivity with related allergens: structurally related to eugenol (CAS 97-53-0, separate Annex III Reference 71) and methyl eugenol (CAS 93-15-2). Cross-sensitisation between isoeugenol and other Fragrance Mix I components is documented; isoeugenol contributes 6-22% of FM I patch-test reactions per SCCS/1459/11 p. 200.

Reg (EU) 2023/1545 expanded the Annex III allergen labeling list to >80 substances (transition through July 2028 for new products) but did not change Isoeugenol's Reference 73 thresholds or 0,02% cap.

No CIR safety assessment exists — verified absent by alphabetical traversal of the September 2022 CIR Quick Reference Table (alphabetically: Isodecyl Stearate → Isododecane → Isoeicosane → Isohexadecane, with no Isoeugenol row in between). CIR defers fragrance-only ingredients to RIFM/IFRA/SCCS.

Emerging research (Ahn et al. 2020 PMID 32119530, 2023 PMID 37042673) has identified additional thiol-reactive 7,4'-oxyneolignan dimers from isoeugenol photo-oxidation and proposed a hydroxy quinone methide as the reactive intermediate — suggesting isoeugenol may possess prehapten (autoxidation) character in addition to its SCCS-classified prohapten (bioactivation) mechanism. Regulatory classification has not yet been updated.


EU CosIng
Restricted (max 0.02%)
Use limit: 0.02%
EU Annex III Reference 73 (2-Methoxy-4-(prop-1-enyl)-phenol / Isoeugenol, CAS 97-54-1 / trans-isomer 5932-68-3): maximum concentration 0,02% in non-oral cosmetic products (no max specified for oral products); label disclosure required when concentration exceeds 0,001% in leave-on or 0,01% in rinse-off products. Unlike most other Annex III fragrance allergens which have labeling-only restrictions, Isoeugenol carries a hard 0,02% maximum-use cap reflecting its higher sensitisation potency.
EU SCCS
Restricted
Established contact allergen in humans (Table 13-1, SCCS/1459/11, p. 107): +++ rating (101-1000 published positive patch test cases). Asterisked as identified in 1999 SCCNFP fragrance allergens opinion. Listed in Table 13-5 (p. 114) among 12 single-chemical established fragrance allergens of special concern. Classified as established prohapten of clinical importance (Section 13.3 / Table 13-6, p. 118-119) — bioactivated by enzymatic oxidation in skin (NOT autoxidation in the bottle); SCCS distinguishes isoeugenol from prehaptens (limonene, linalool) by the absence of an air-oxidation activation column in Table 13-6. One of only four allergens (with HICC, cinnamal, hydroxycitronellal) for which dose-response data exist (p. 115). Patch test prevalence in baseline series: IVDK 2007 1.3% (n=2063), Groningen 2009 1.3% at 2% pet., Wöhrl 2001 5.4% (n=747), St Johns 2001-2005 incidence 2.67%, IVDK 2010 1.62-3.41%, Alicante 11/86 (12.8%) on extended fragrance series (per-ingredient profile p. 200).
[1]
EU SCCS · Jun 27, 2012Live

SCCS/1459/11 — Opinion on Fragrance Allergens in Cosmetic Products (adopted 26-27 June 2012). ISOEUGENOL CAS 97-54-1 listed in Table 13-1…

ISOEUGENOL* 97-54-1 +++sccs_o_102_0.pdf, p. 107 (Table 13-1: Established contact allergens in humans)
Verificationpdf_textView source
[2]
EU CosIng · Nov 30, 2009Document match

EU Regulation 1223/2009 Annex III (Restricted Substances) — Reference 73: 2-Methoxy-4-(prop-1-enyl)-phenol / Isoeugenol (CAS 97-54-1; tra…

0,02 %EU Reg 1223/2009 Annex III, Reference 73 (Isoeugenol), column (g) Maximum concentration in ready for use preparation
Verificationweb_textView source
[3]
Peer-reviewed (PubMed) · Nov 1, 2016

Api AM, Belsito D, Bhatia S, et al. — RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, isoeugenol, CAS Registry Number 97-54-1. Food Chem Tox…

Verificationweb_textView on PubMed
[4]
Peer-reviewed (PubMed) · Mar 1, 1997

Bertrand F, Basketter DA, Roberts DW, Lepoittevin JP — Skin sensitization to eugenol and isoeugenol in mice: possible metabolic pathways …

Verificationweb_textView on PubMed
[5]
Peer-reviewed (PubMed) · Nov 1, 1999

White IR, Johansen JD, Arnau EG, et al. — Isoeugenol is an important contact allergen: can it be safely replaced with isoeugenyl acetate?…

Verificationweb_textView on PubMed
[6]
Peer-reviewed (PubMed) · Apr 1, 2023

Ahn J, Avonto C, Pandey P, Khan SI, Khan IA, Roberts DW, Chittiboyina AG — Chemistry of Isoeugenol and Its Oxidation Products: Mechanism …

Verificationweb_textView on PubMed
Sources
6
PubMed citations
4
Evidence quality
extensive
Last verified
Re-reviewed when a new CIR / SCCS opinion publishes.